Freedom of speech and “hate speech”

Unravelling the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

Authors

  • Paul Coleman
  • Roger Kiska

Keywords:

Hate speech, freedom of speech, European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right, and has been labelled as such since the beginnings of the “human rights” era. However, there is an increasing belief that some speech, loosely known as “hate speech”, is unworthy of protection. This article outlines the principles of free speech as enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and demonstrates how the new restriction on so-called “hate speech”, particularly in regard to issues of sexual morality, is having an erosive effect on freedom of speech.

Author Biographies

Paul Coleman

Paul Coleman LL.M. (*1985) serves as legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). He is a solicitor of the Senior Courts of England and Wales and obtained his Bachelor of Law from Newcastle University and his LL.M. from the University of Northumbria. He is a regularly featured speaker on religious liberty issues throughout the U.K. and Europe.

Roger Kiska

Roger Kiska J.D. (*1974) is senior legal counsel for ADF. He has acted in more than twenty cases before the European Court of Human Rights as well as provided numerous keynote addresses on issues of fundamental human rights to various committees and inter-groups at the European Parliament and at national Parliaments. He is also currently a member of the Advisory Panel of the Fundamental Rights Agency of the European Union. Kiska received his Juris Doctorate from Ave Maria School of Law; Masters of Arts from Vanderbilt University; and his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Manitoba. Both Coleman and Kiska work at the European office of ADF in Vienna, Austria, where they specialize in international litigation with a focus on European law.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20